Cossy
Urmstongran
Let’s all agree to just call them ‘migrants’. Who happen to pay human traffickers £££s to come over in rubber boats. They come (often) because France has turned down their applications for asylum. France only accept c.29% of migrants who wish to claim asylum, so they try their luck here. We by default accept over 60% of claims (? Why the discrepancy but that’s another conversation) and they KNOW that those who are refused asylum status are rarely sent back anywhere anyway - so for them it’s a win-win situation. Add on all the care and attention we provide - no tent city here, no siree - these migrants rock up on our shores pretty certain they’ve hit the supposed jackpot.
“Win win”? Interesting phrase!
Many only pay a “deposit” to their traffickers agreeing to work for them (they believe legitimately) once here, however of course if not picked up and properly “escorted” by our authorities they then disappear into our black economy, often into modern slavery. Those who are “housed” aren’t, in the main, housed in comfortable hotels and fed via the hotels. During lockdown they, along with our homeless, were housed in more than adequate accommodation, not quite so now.
I agree migration is a huge issue and much more should be done to control both those entering illegally and via legal means.
I wouldn't call gambling your life in a leaky boat, having spent you life savings on paying a known scoundrel for the journey, as a win-win situation.