Gransnet forums

News & politics

Labour. Our next Government.

(355 Posts)
Urmstongran Sat 18-May-24 14:24:02

You only had to watch Angela Rayner, Labour’s deputy leader, launching the new six-pledge card thing in Essex on Thursday. She bounced onto the stage with that expression politicians have the morning after a huge victory. Her face was one big soporific smile and she’s clearly been away attending a John Prescott word-mangling masterclass. “We aren’t,” she said, although she actually said “we are”, “promising the world,” which she quickly corrected to “the earth”, before adding: “But we are promising that what we are confident on we can deliver on.” Which I had to listen back to about six times to check I had it word for word.

Rachel Reeves then promised to “never play fast and loose with the public finances”. Let’s see how her VAT on private schools policy works out – indications are that already parents are eyeing up state-school alternatives for this September. Ed Miliband is going to “take back control of our destiny”, Yvette Cooper is “giving young people their future back”, while Sir Keir Starmer walked into that room filled with people in suits, tie-less in white shirt sleeves so you could notice him.

It all seems a bit vague. Maybe that’s deliberate?

GrannyRose15 Sun 19-May-24 00:43:51

What I want from the next government is people who do what they say they will do? If you could only believe what is written in manifestos the choice would be easy. Vote for the party with the most policies you agree with. But it isn’t as simple as that unfortunately. Policies are introduced that were never put to the electorate and governments renege on the policies that we voted on. I am a conservative but I thought Keir Starmer’s six point plan was great. Absolutely nothing there to disagree with. But it just won’t happen. We know we can’t trust Labour to do what they say they will. Can we trust anyone? Might as well stick with the devil I know.

MayBee70 Sun 19-May-24 02:38:01

Why can’t we trust Labour to do what they say they will?

Mollygo Sun 19-May-24 04:17:13

MayBee70

Why can’t we trust Labour to do what they say they will?

I don’t trust any party to do what they say they will. The excuses are always that they can’t, because of the mess left by the previous government, even though they have known about that mess, then there’s the cost which is always more than they thought and then they realise that it’s not as easy to do as it was to say.
I’d love to be wrong on any or all of those things, whenever we have a change of government.

maddyone Sun 19-May-24 07:38:51

Why would anyone trust any party to do as they’ve said they will do?
I’m surprised that that anyone still believes any political party at this stage in our lives.

Elegran Sun 19-May-24 08:19:58

Smileless2012

Yes but surely without the right to buy, more would have been available Elegran.

If the money from the right to buy had been invested in building new council housing (calling it social housing if they had wanted to change the image) the stocks of housing would have stayed sufficient. However, that was banned for a long time, and housing stocks became less and less as more people bought the house they were living in. Meanwhile, council budgets shrank and shrank. Amenities like housing, libraries and community education courses shrank too.

MaizieD Sun 19-May-24 08:25:42

Casdon

It doesn’t matter much what over 65 traditional Tory voters vote though, as it’s not your votes that Labour will be targeting. As a demographic, over 65s are known to be the most set in their voting habits, and most right wing, so not worth the candle. Even in this group though the polls only currently show a 4% Tory bias.

This⬆️

Exactly what I was thinking last night.

Unlike most of the posters on this thread I have managed to reach my three score and ten without becoming stereotypically 'old' in my view of politics and politicians and I don't agree at all with those who seem the think that it's terribly mature to dismiss all governments of whatever colour as all the same and useless to boot.

Looking back over 50 years or more what I can see is Labour achievements which more than outweigh its faults and unwavering tory cruelty to the most vulnerable in society. I have no doubt whatever about where my will go.

Pantglas2 Sun 19-May-24 08:35:05

The ludicrous excuse given by Labour that councils could rebuild their housing stock having given tenants a discount of 35-70% off market value is laughable!

Builders don’t work for nothing and materials cost money so even if Blair had righted Thatcher’s wrong and allowed it, and let’s remember he chose not to, finances dictate there wouldn’t be a one-for-one situation.

nanna8 Sun 19-May-24 08:59:58

Interesting how any posts that don’t support Sir Starmer ‘disappear’ Curious.

petra Sun 19-May-24 09:00:58

MayBee70

Why can’t we trust Labour to do what they say they will?

Because they’re politicians 😥

Wheniwasyourage Sun 19-May-24 09:11:14

nanna8

Interesting how any posts that don’t support Sir Starmer ‘disappear’ Curious.

Sorry, nanna8, but that is rubbish. Just look back through the thread!

LizzieDrip Sun 19-May-24 09:30:34

Interesting how any posts that don’t support Sir Starmer ‘disappear’ Curious

What! Have you read the thread nanna8?

LizzieDrip Sun 19-May-24 09:32:55

Looking back over 50 years or more what I can see is Labour achievements which more than outweigh its faults and unwavering tory cruelty to the most vulnerable in society. I have no doubt whatever about where my will go

Hear, hear MaizieD!

MaizieD Sun 19-May-24 09:35:38

Message deleted by Gransnet. Here's a link to our Talk guidelines.

Mollygo Sun 19-May-24 09:37:21

Why do you have to be so nasty about a person from a working class background who achieved a top job in their profession and earned their knighthood by virtue of having done so? Aren't people in the Labour party allowed to be anything other than horny handed sons of the soil and exploited factory workers?
???

GrannyGravy13 Sun 19-May-24 09:45:20

I have just turned on Sunday Brunch (Channel 4) only to see Kier Starmer as guest chef cooking Tandoori Salmon.

Electioneering has well and truly commenced.

LizzieDrip Sun 19-May-24 09:52:10

I suppose people will criticise KS for cooking Tandoori salmon - too foreign and too posh! Perhaps he’d be expected to cook ham bones and boiled cabbage🙈

GrannyGravy13 Sun 19-May-24 09:55:40

LizzieDrip

I suppose people will criticise KS for cooking Tandoori salmon - too foreign and too posh! Perhaps he’d be expected to cook ham bones and boiled cabbage🙈

My criticism is purely why is the leader of the Labour Party guest chef on what is primarily a cooking/entertainment programme when we have 100’s of excellent professional chefs in the UK?

Casdon Sun 19-May-24 09:58:17

I’d trust him with food hygiene anyway.
Actually it’s a positive sign that the election isn’t too far away. Expect to see Rishi Sunak on I’m a Celebrity Get Me Out Of Here later this year.

Germanshepherdsmum Sun 19-May-24 09:59:47

Desperate for publicity, to be seen as a man of the people.

Casdon Sun 19-May-24 09:59:49

..or even better, Jacob Rees-Mogg chairing Have I Got News For You….

GrannyGravy13 Sun 19-May-24 10:27:52

I do worry that Labour is banging out the same household economic trope.

I also think they are saying what they think people want to hear without actually knowing how to follow through.

I am a so called floating voter for the first time in my life.

Dickens Sun 19-May-24 10:37:07

GrannyGravy13

LizzieDrip

I suppose people will criticise KS for cooking Tandoori salmon - too foreign and too posh! Perhaps he’d be expected to cook ham bones and boiled cabbage🙈

My criticism is purely why is the leader of the Labour Party guest chef on what is primarily a cooking/entertainment programme when we have 100’s of excellent professional chefs in the UK?

... because now and then, these types of programmes bring in a high-profile public figure as a guest?

It's been going on for ages, and these guests are from various walks-of-life.

I presume the programme-makers, or the participants themselves, assume it increases viewing numbers.

This is not to support KS - I'm just puzzled why you are puzzled at this 'tradition' of introducing guests into programmes on various subjects - on which they might have no obvious connection.

Louella12 Sun 19-May-24 10:43:02

I'm not a fan of Keir. I find him rather robotic.

I do like Angela Raynor though.

Callistemon21 Sun 19-May-24 10:50:27

I like Jess Phillips, much prefer her to any of the other Labour politicians.

Dickens Sun 19-May-24 10:53:28

LizzieDrip

I suppose people will criticise KS for cooking Tandoori salmon - too foreign and too posh! Perhaps he’d be expected to cook ham bones and boiled cabbage🙈

I think it's fairly certain that both Sunak and Starmer will be criticised by those who dislike one or the other (or both), regardless of what they do.

If you don't like the party they represent - or don't like them - it's not difficult to find a reason to condemn them.

... which is why, for me, pre-election campaigning is so bloody tedious. Whilst they are verbally sparring with each other either in the House or courtesy of the media, the rest of us are getting on with the life they have largely created for us; worrying about our bills and whether we'll get an appointment to see one of the diminishing number of doctors available for such appointments. And all the other minutiae of our humdrum lives.