Is this curtains for Ukraine? DT will withdraw money to help them fight Russia. I am truly sad and worried. Putin must be dancing round the Kremlin ☹️ It’s a disaster imo.
Bereavement wipes out everything
With only 3 weeks to go, perhaps we can start to watch the shenanigans taking place in the USA.
Trump is warning America of his intention post election.
“Donald Trump has provoked an angry backlash from Democrats after calling for the US armed forces to be turned against his political adversaries when voters go to the polls at next month’s presidential election.
In comments that added further fuel to fears of an authoritarian crackdown if he recaptures the White House, the Republican nominee said the military or national guard should be deployed against opponents that he called “the enemy within” when the election takes place on 5 November.
He singled out the California congressman, Adam Schiff, who was the lead prosecutor in the ex-president’s first impeachment trial, as posing a bigger threat to a free and fair election than foreign terrorists or illegal immigrants, his usual prime target for abuse.
Trump’s comments, to Fox News in response to a question on possible election “chaos”, triggered an angry reaction from Kamala Harris’s campaign, which likened them to previous remarks that he would be a dictator “on day one” of a second presidency and his suggestions that the US constitution should be terminated to overturn the 2020 election result, which he falsely claims was stolen by Joe Biden”.
Is this curtains for Ukraine? DT will withdraw money to help them fight Russia. I am truly sad and worried. Putin must be dancing round the Kremlin ☹️ It’s a disaster imo.
It is a very sad day for humanity.
Thank God Trump won, else we would all have been doomed!
This is very different to 2016.
Grim news for the world.
JudyBloom
Thank God Trump won, else we would all have been doomed!
I don't suppose you would care to explain this comment.
Galaxy
I worry for democracy.
Er this was democracy.
One election does not 'democracy' make!
If Trump is able to force a solution in Ukraine that has to be a force for good. The word is if.
I hope Lammy and Starmer can cope with Trump in charge. Seems like our growth forecasts are damaged now. Does Trump as President help Farage back home to build Reform?
I have been listening and reading quite a bit this morning, and I think that the thing that I found most convincing was when someone was commenting on what history will make about this period.
The argument was that Trump, Brexit, and the movement to the right and authoritarianism throughout the world is a result of the world financial shock of 2008, which resulted in so much hardship for ordinary people and the failure for governments to address this.
The insane leverage by the banks and subsequent crash, meant something like 1 in 50 families losing their home in the USA, many of which have struggled to recover from.
In the U.K. austerity, by cutting public services to the bone, middle class was no longer a by-word for life time employment, which meant that people felt far less secure and the trust in politicians gone.
Meanwhile the very wealthy grew even wealthier, and with an apparent ability to influence governments throughout the world meant democracy was no longer the force we lived under in our youth.
Whitewavemark2
I have been listening and reading quite a bit this morning, and I think that the thing that I found most convincing was when someone was commenting on what history will make about this period.
The argument was that Trump, Brexit, and the movement to the right and authoritarianism throughout the world is a result of the world financial shock of 2008, which resulted in so much hardship for ordinary people and the failure for governments to address this.
The insane leverage by the banks and subsequent crash, meant something like 1 in 50 families losing their home in the USA, many of which have struggled to recover from.
In the U.K. austerity, by cutting public services to the bone, middle class was no longer a by-word for life time employment, which meant that people felt far less secure and the trust in politicians gone.
Meanwhile the very wealthy grew even wealthier, and with an apparent ability to influence governments throughout the world meant democracy was no longer the force we lived under in our youth.
As the real experiences of the dangers of populism are lost from living memory, they are more likely to recur.
I said from the start that DT would win, all the fault of Biden who should have graciously withdrawn so much earlier so that the Democrats had time to choose a suitable candidate.He didn’t and they had to panic into choosing KH.
“Democracy in the US (as in other so-called democracies) is questionable.”
That really is a ridiculous statement,
David49
“Democracy in the US (as in other so-called democracies) is questionable.”
That really is a ridiculous statement,
It sure is.
Not getting the result you want is still democracy.
Mamie
Whitewavemark2
I have been listening and reading quite a bit this morning, and I think that the thing that I found most convincing was when someone was commenting on what history will make about this period.
The argument was that Trump, Brexit, and the movement to the right and authoritarianism throughout the world is a result of the world financial shock of 2008, which resulted in so much hardship for ordinary people and the failure for governments to address this.
The insane leverage by the banks and subsequent crash, meant something like 1 in 50 families losing their home in the USA, many of which have struggled to recover from.
In the U.K. austerity, by cutting public services to the bone, middle class was no longer a by-word for life time employment, which meant that people felt far less secure and the trust in politicians gone.
Meanwhile the very wealthy grew even wealthier, and with an apparent ability to influence governments throughout the world meant democracy was no longer the force we lived under in our youth.As the real experiences of the dangers of populism are lost from living memory, they are more likely to recur.
Yes I think that is correct, but someone did argue that populism has always been part of democracy throughout its history, it is when it gets out of control that it is so bad.
Harry and Meghan on a plane to Portugal already.
Oreo
I said from the start that DT would win, all the fault of Biden who should have graciously withdrawn so much earlier so that the Democrats had time to choose a suitable candidate.He didn’t and they had to panic into choosing KH.
The campaign demonizing Trump, calling him a Facist probably cost the democrats the election, it was all too personal. The hope that Harris appealed to women voters didnt play out, Hilliary Clinton didnt either, that must have been disappointing for her.
Whitewavemark2
I have been listening and reading quite a bit this morning, and I think that the thing that I found most convincing was when someone was commenting on what history will make about this period.
The argument was that Trump, Brexit, and the movement to the right and authoritarianism throughout the world is a result of the world financial shock of 2008, which resulted in so much hardship for ordinary people and the failure for governments to address this.
The insane leverage by the banks and subsequent crash, meant something like 1 in 50 families losing their home in the USA, many of which have struggled to recover from.
In the U.K. austerity, by cutting public services to the bone, middle class was no longer a by-word for life time employment, which meant that people felt far less secure and the trust in politicians gone.
Meanwhile the very wealthy grew even wealthier, and with an apparent ability to influence governments throughout the world meant democracy was no longer the force we lived under in our youth.
I have been banging on and on and on about this for such a long time.
While we remain captive to neoclassical/neoliberal economic dogma nothing is going to change.
We have 4million people in the UK on or below the poverty line. We have people struggling with basic living costs. We voted Labour because we thought they might do something about this but many are desperately disappointed when they can see Labour taking exactly the same economic path as has been trodden since the '70s.
The wealthy grow wealthier because that is exactly what the economic dogma driving the UK, the US and other 1st world countries is designed to do.
The force we had in our youth wasn't 'democracy'. It was a different economic system that was improving the quality of life for more of our citizens and narrowing the inequality gap. It wasn't perfect by any means but it was better than what we have now.
They've had such a poor choice of candidates, Trump for all he stands for, as a woman, I'd never have voted for him, but Kamala, with her weird speeches and maniacal bursts of inappropriate laughter, she wouldn't have inspired me either, and personally I care not a jot about celebrity endorsements, they're just people. People who may well have talents. I am wondering as far as the wider population are concerned maybe their contributions could be counter productive, why would anyone care how Taylor Swift is going to vote outside her teeny bopper fan base. Do they take people for fools so easily swayed by a "personality" incredibly rich people, not facing the day to day problems most of the electorate have to deal with.
So many liberals, often comfortably off themselves, simply can't hide their derision for either the poor and disenfranchised who have the temerity to have a different point of view and there is an expectation somehow that if you are poor and working class, or from an ethnic minority background that your vote belongs to the left. Otherwise, those who veer from that stance could be described in the words of Biden as "garbage" who know how that comment inspired undecideds to just swing it for Trump, what a liability that man is. Before that we had Hillary Clinton's "Basket of Deplorables" I'd say just read Demon Copperfield to know how that plays out in the poorest of the poor in the US's Appalachians, those living on subsistence levels, beleaguered by an opiate epidemic through the complicity of big pharma. They know just how they are viewed by their loftier and well heeled compatriots. There is also a complacency about the black and Latino votes what are they some homogeneous mass that all think in the same way? are they expected to have group thoughts?. Closer to home we had Labout MP, Dawn Butler only recently describe Kemi Badenoch as a white supremacist in a black face
could she be any more insulting, and has she been ticked off for that?, well not to my knowledge.
Ultimately, as Clinton was prone to say "It's the economy" and that fared better under Trump. I had no idea how bad the cost of living was over there until we recently met up with step grandchild who lives and works in the States, one example a punnet of grapes, I'd pay £1.80 in Sainsbury's she tells us costs something in the region of $18 and not from Wholefoods I might add. Ok so you don't need to buy grapes but just as a benchmark of how prices have risen since we last went, going back maybe ten years or so. One of our sons goes over there about twice a year and he says the same, the cost of living has risen exponentially. Getting by will be the driving force for great swathes of the US, in how they have voted, not foreign wars or green issues, but how they're going to put food on the table
Terribull
Excellent clear thinking comments 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
“The wealthy grow wealthier because that is exactly what the economic dogma driving the UK, the US and other 1st world countries is designed to do.”
I’m trying to think of a country where that does not happen, it certainly does in China and India where the gap between rich and poor is massively higher.
The third world countries I have visited the relatively well off urban populations have very little regard for the rural poor. As for urban poor, they will employ them as maids or guards in return for food and shelter, but it doesn’t go much further than that.
It is easy to run a campaign of hate, division and vitriol it seems.
NotSpaghetti
It is easy to run a campaign of hate, division and vitriol it seems.
No I don’t think it is, it needs promises of sweetness and light to voters. Promises of a better future and as Clinton once said
It’s the economy stupid!’
It didn’t help that the Democrats ran a woman candidate who spent half her time laughing and grinning.It needed a serious person at the very least who could get the message of democrat
Policies through to voters.
NotSpaghetti
It is easy to run a campaign of hate, division and vitriol it seems.
And lies. It is a bad day for democracy, that you can win by stirring hatred, an almost entirely negative campaign.
I feel it was "the border" and the money in people's pocket that "did it" for Trump.
It is Brexit all over again in my opinion.
The fact that America is actually doing well has not filtered down because the poorest feel the rise in costs of basic foodstuffs and gas etc first.
He will be splitting families up now to remove undocumented migrants no doubt - so people will see a rise in removals.
Ukraine really worries me.
And access to healthcare in America
But it's not fair to blame all the American people. Lots just believe what they want of him and discount the rest as bluster....
Keeping fingers crossed here.
Not with much hope.
Ukraine really worries me.
And access to healthcare in America generally, as well as Womens' health.
Trump continuing to politicise the judiciary until its ruled by pro Trump judges, and more of project 25.
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »Get our top conversations, latest advice, fantastic competitions, and more, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter here.