Galaxy
I dont join in the worry about Musk because I recognise the hypocrisy of it. One of Labours major donors is a South African businessman. The previous owner of Twitter supported the Democrats, financially and via the information on Twitter. I also dont hold the view that the people cant think for themselves, I understand perfectly why they reject that viewpoint.
One of Labours major donors is a South African businessman. The previous owner of Twitter supported the Democrats, financially and via the information on Twitter.
... so what makes you think that I - for example - am OK with Starmer's increasingly close relationship with 'big business' and the wealthy which has now overtaken donations made by the trade unions? That's apart from the non-cash donations for things like premises, sponsorship, consultancy services, etc?
Of course, parties rely on the backing of donors, that's how it works, but it is not hypocritical to wonder why the world's richest man, who doesn't live here and never has, is allegedly going to donate an amount which might broadly equal the sum total given to all the political parties, to a political party operating as a company.
And I'm pretty sure people can think for themselves and clearly do as they iterate on here and elsewhere their reasoning.
To question their conclusions is not questioning their ability. And I have never, during my whole 'history' on GN ever claimed that those who hold a different political viewpoint to me, are incapable of thinking for themselves.