Gransnet forums

News & politics

Venezuela air attack

(408 Posts)
Grandmabatty Sat 03-Jan-26 08:35:31

US have attacked Venezuela with missiles. This is unforgivable

foxie48 Tue 06-Jan-26 08:03:35

Well so much for democracy in Venezuela! Trump has announced he's in charge and there won't be early elections. Who elected Trump?

David49 Tue 06-Jan-26 08:37:04

Syracute

Did you listen to Trumps speech at all ? Thats all he talked about was oil and how much money it would bring to the USA.
Very little was spoken about the plight of the Venezualan people . He doesn’t care about that at all.

Profit for the US plays well for his supporters at home.
Venezuelans now have the opportunity to rejoin the international community and become more prosperous, the US will support them doing this.

They could stay in the poverty and chaos Maduro gave them or improve it’s their choice, they have a new president we can only hope they make the right choices. Free elections need to follow soon.

Whitewavemark2 Tue 06-Jan-26 08:37:09

Anyone asked the Venezuelans?

Never ever think an authoritarian populist leader like Trump has the ordinary bloke in the street best interest at heart.

The don’t. Never have, never will.

David49 Tue 06-Jan-26 08:52:05

foxie48

China gets it's oil from a lot of different countries. David is correct in that it's biggest supplier is Russia, it takes about 47% of it's oil but it also takes 68% of Venezuela's oil that it sells at a heavily discounted price to China. Venezuela has the largest reserves in the world and China will be most unhappy to see that potential supply under the control of the US. IMO These issues are not about "now" they are about who controls long term access to important world resources.

My point was China can easily make up the shortfall if Venezuela stops supplying, when sanctions are removed it will no longer be cheap oil China will pay the going rate.

David49 Tue 06-Jan-26 08:58:33

David49

foxie48

China gets it's oil from a lot of different countries. David is correct in that it's biggest supplier is Russia, it takes about 47% of it's oil but it also takes 68% of Venezuela's oil that it sells at a heavily discounted price to China. Venezuela has the largest reserves in the world and China will be most unhappy to see that potential supply under the control of the US. IMO These issues are not about "now" they are about who controls long term access to important world resources.

My point was China can easily make up the shortfall if Venezuela stops supplying, when sanctions are removed it will no longer be cheap oil China will pay the going rate.

There are no oil sanctions on China they buy the cheapest available, Russia, Iran and Venezuela, despite the Sanctions we put on all those countries.

We put sanctions on those countries because they are despotic regimes, China laughs at us and benefits from cheap oil

MaizieD Tue 06-Jan-26 09:02:42

I have just watched part of a CNN interview of Stephen Miller. This is the man who, it is claimed, was the major contributor to the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025 and, it is claimed, is the person pulling Trump’s strings.

I think it’s terrifying

Would anyone here on Gnet nod along with what he is saying?

This isn’t an AI fake. The link is to BlueSky social

bsky.app/profile/atrupar.com/post/3mbplx5sygx2h

Whitewavemark2 Tue 06-Jan-26 09:10:13

I’ll watch that in a minute, just wanted to say that this is zero about democracy.

Trump is ruling by coercion. If Rodriguez doesn’t come up to scratch she will be removed and replaced.

Where is Vance in all this?

Cossy Tue 06-Jan-26 09:33:02

Whitewavemark2

Anyone asked the Venezuelans?

Never ever think an authoritarian populist leader like Trump has the ordinary bloke in the street best interest at heart.

The don’t. Never have, never will.

Absolutely!

petra Tue 06-Jan-26 09:46:04

MaizieD

I have just watched part of a CNN interview of Stephen Miller. This is the man who, it is claimed, was the major contributor to the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025 and, it is claimed, is the person pulling Trump’s strings.

I think it’s terrifying

Would anyone here on Gnet nod along with what he is saying?

This isn’t an AI fake. The link is to BlueSky social

bsky.app/profile/atrupar.com/post/3mbplx5sygx2h

I’ve been watching him for a while.
He’s what we call a hired fist. If he wasn’t doing this job he could be an enforcer for the mob.
He’s with his own people, though.

icanhandthemback Tue 06-Jan-26 10:28:03

MaizieD

I have just watched part of a CNN interview of Stephen Miller. This is the man who, it is claimed, was the major contributor to the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025 and, it is claimed, is the person pulling Trump’s strings.

I think it’s terrifying

Would anyone here on Gnet nod along with what he is saying?

This isn’t an AI fake. The link is to BlueSky social

bsky.app/profile/atrupar.com/post/3mbplx5sygx2h

Absolutely terrifying.

Elegran Tue 06-Jan-26 10:51:44

ronib

*Elegran*. Trump is 79 years old. No way will oil extraction from Venezuela have a quick turnaround. How exactly can Trump and his family personally gain from it? Surely Shell and other major oil companies will want to see a huge profit from drilling?

Trump can't help himself. If there is money to be made out of something, he is first in the rush for it. He is 79, but he collects the stuff as though he will live for ever and needs it to keep up his lifestyle. If he doesn't live for ever, his family will inherit any cash, shares, etcetera that he has acquired, and they are unlikely to release their grip on them to anyone else.

ronib Tue 06-Jan-26 11:04:14

America might think it’s a super power and perhaps it is, but there are a few problems with the way it approaches its various projects. So what happens if the jury in New York finds the Venezuelan president and his wife not guilty of narcoterrorism plus other charges? Presumably there’s still the concept of proof and evidence in the USA?
Trump seems to have adopted the persona of a pantomime dame…

MaizieD Tue 06-Jan-26 11:11:41

I tried to get a transcript of the CNN interview clip I posted because some people don't like following links but AI can't do it for me and none seems to exist.

This is the link to it on the CNN website. The insane terrifying rant starts 12.07 minutes into the 15minute interview.

edition.cnn.com/2026/01/05/politics/video/senior-white-house-aide-stephen-miller-says-us-military-threat-to-maintain-control-of-venezuela-digvid

LemonJam Tue 06-Jan-26 12:17:15

Charging Maduro and his wife of drug trafficking "conspiracies" is side theatre. The US justice department already has previously charged Maduro in March 2020 during Trump's early first administration. Trump himself openly acknowledged this weekend his motivation was his desire to seize control of Venezuela's oil reserves.

Yet only last month Trump freed former Honduran President, Juan Orlando Hernandez who had been convicted in the US of smuggling more than 400 tons of cocaine into the US.

Trump has a pattern of leniency for some alleged drug criminals. Hernandez is not an isolated case. Trump has pardoned and released a significant number of other figures involved in drug trafficking: Ross Ulbricht, Larry Hoover, Cesar Humberto Lopez-Lario, General Salvador Cienfuegos Zepeda, etc.

As far back as 2019 it was alleged by some that Putin and Trump did a deal- Trump will lay off Putin's plans to expand into Europe, to conquer Ukraine first; Putin would in return lay off Trump's plans to expand into South America.

BlessedArt Tue 06-Jan-26 12:31:41

@ David,

That old chestnut? The old “us imperialists are grabbing your resources and installing our puppet to better the lives of you poor natives?” spiel doesn’t work for in 2026. The rest of the world is buying that nonsense anymore.

Guess what? Millions of Americans would have healthcare coverage and education assistance if the same happened to Trump as Maduro. And at least half of the US would be happy to see Trump in a dank, dark prison. Find a better story. Venezuelans will find their oil taken, poverty in place, and a much more polluted environment. Chevron literally killed people down there as oil companies often do with their reckless operations. Trump has now invited the rest to do the same. This evil, greedy plot was brought to the oil companies before Congress had a hint. It’s disgusting and condescending to even pretend this will do anything but create more poverty for the average Venezuelan as the American puppets enrich themselves and their US and European masters

Cossy Tue 06-Jan-26 12:41:16

BlessedArt

@ David,

That old chestnut? The old “us imperialists are grabbing your resources and installing our puppet to better the lives of you poor natives?” spiel doesn’t work for in 2026. The rest of the world is buying that nonsense anymore.

Guess what? Millions of Americans would have healthcare coverage and education assistance if the same happened to Trump as Maduro. And at least half of the US would be happy to see Trump in a dank, dark prison. Find a better story. Venezuelans will find their oil taken, poverty in place, and a much more polluted environment. Chevron literally killed people down there as oil companies often do with their reckless operations. Trump has now invited the rest to do the same. This evil, greedy plot was brought to the oil companies before Congress had a hint. It’s disgusting and condescending to even pretend this will do anything but create more poverty for the average Venezuelan as the American puppets enrich themselves and their US and European masters

How I’d love to see Trump locked away somewhere horrible for his remaining life! In my eyes he’s as much (if not more) a criminal as those he purports to accuse.

Furthermore he has pardoned and released some extremely dubious people!

Cossy Tue 06-Jan-26 12:45:03

ronib

America might think it’s a super power and perhaps it is, but there are a few problems with the way it approaches its various projects. So what happens if the jury in New York finds the Venezuelan president and his wife not guilty of narcoterrorism plus other charges? Presumably there’s still the concept of proof and evidence in the USA?
Trump seems to have adopted the persona of a pantomime dame…

It’s seems if judges don’t agree with Trump they are penalised

David49 Tue 06-Jan-26 12:47:14

BlessedArt

@ David,

That old chestnut? The old “us imperialists are grabbing your resources and installing our puppet to better the lives of you poor natives?” spiel doesn’t work for in 2026. The rest of the world is buying that nonsense anymore.

Guess what? Millions of Americans would have healthcare coverage and education assistance if the same happened to Trump as Maduro. And at least half of the US would be happy to see Trump in a dank, dark prison. Find a better story. Venezuelans will find their oil taken, poverty in place, and a much more polluted environment. Chevron literally killed people down there as oil companies often do with their reckless operations. Trump has now invited the rest to do the same. This evil, greedy plot was brought to the oil companies before Congress had a hint. It’s disgusting and condescending to even pretend this will do anything but create more poverty for the average Venezuelan as the American puppets enrich themselves and their US and European masters

Someone will buy Venezuelan oil currently it’s China, does China care what about human rights in any of the countries it trades with. No, its policy is not to interfere with domestic issues, child labour, blood diamonds, ivory, persecution, invading neighbours, sponsoring terrorism, are all supported by Chinas trade.

Before you condem the US consider the alternative.

BlessedArt Tue 06-Jan-26 13:30:19

Re-read what you wrote David!

“It’s policy is not to interfere with domestic issues…”

That’s what nations do when they respect the sovereignty of other nations. Your tune would change if a nation decided that the US and/or the UK needed a new leader and murdered dozens of American or UK citizens to achieve it. Just pure hypocrisy. The US doesn’t have any moral high ground here. None. All the superpowers are as bad as each other. Acknowledging it and defending it or not the same.

BlessedArt Tue 06-Jan-26 13:30:57

*are not the same

David49 Tue 06-Jan-26 13:43:10

BlessedArt

Re-read what you wrote David!

“It’s policy is not to interfere with domestic issues…”

That’s what nations do when they respect the sovereignty of other nations. Your tune would change if a nation decided that the US and/or the UK needed a new leader and murdered dozens of American or UK citizens to achieve it. Just pure hypocrisy. The US doesn’t have any moral high ground here. None. All the superpowers are as bad as each other. Acknowledging it and defending it or not the same.

The UK supported the sanctions on Venezuela because of human rights abuses are you saying we were wrong.

We have sanctions against Russia would you support removing Putin.

BlessedArt Tue 06-Jan-26 13:49:44

Those sanctimonious sanctions on Venezuela are what is driving the poverty. As I said, no moral high ground.

David49 Tue 06-Jan-26 13:55:09

BlessedArt

Those sanctimonious sanctions on Venezuela are what is driving the poverty. As I said, no moral high ground.

So you support the alternative to do nothing and accept that oppressors like Putin and Maduro can do what they want.

MaizieD Tue 06-Jan-26 14:06:23

David49

BlessedArt

@ David,

That old chestnut? The old “us imperialists are grabbing your resources and installing our puppet to better the lives of you poor natives?” spiel doesn’t work for in 2026. The rest of the world is buying that nonsense anymore.

Guess what? Millions of Americans would have healthcare coverage and education assistance if the same happened to Trump as Maduro. And at least half of the US would be happy to see Trump in a dank, dark prison. Find a better story. Venezuelans will find their oil taken, poverty in place, and a much more polluted environment. Chevron literally killed people down there as oil companies often do with their reckless operations. Trump has now invited the rest to do the same. This evil, greedy plot was brought to the oil companies before Congress had a hint. It’s disgusting and condescending to even pretend this will do anything but create more poverty for the average Venezuelan as the American puppets enrich themselves and their US and European masters

Someone will buy Venezuelan oil currently it’s China, does China care what about human rights in any of the countries it trades with. No, its policy is not to interfere with domestic issues, child labour, blood diamonds, ivory, persecution, invading neighbours, sponsoring terrorism, are all supported by Chinas trade.

Before you condem the US consider the alternative.

It's global trade, David. Very few companies are ethical, they buy cheap and sell for as much profit as they can make. Few consumers are ethical, either. So they're content to buy despite the ethics of the country making the goods they buy. There's no place for ethics in a consumer society.

China has significantly raised the standard of living for much of its population though wealth inequalities remain wide.

Chatgtp summary:

In short, China has raised the material standard of living dramatically, but inequality and uneven distribution of wealth continue to challenge the sustainability and inclusiveness of that progress. Policymakers are aware of these issues and have increasingly focused on “common prosperity,” but its long-term impact is still unfolding.
Source :
Marshall Education:
www.marshalledu.com/chinarisinginequality?utm_source=chatgpt.com

MaizieD Tue 06-Jan-26 14:10:58

David49

BlessedArt

Re-read what you wrote David!

“It’s policy is not to interfere with domestic issues…”

That’s what nations do when they respect the sovereignty of other nations. Your tune would change if a nation decided that the US and/or the UK needed a new leader and murdered dozens of American or UK citizens to achieve it. Just pure hypocrisy. The US doesn’t have any moral high ground here. None. All the superpowers are as bad as each other. Acknowledging it and defending it or not the same.

The UK supported the sanctions on Venezuela because of human rights abuses are you saying we were wrong.

We have sanctions against Russia would you support removing Putin.

Strange leap in logic there

What does supporting sanctions on Venezuela (which, incidentally. I never have) to do with supporting removing Putin? (Which I don't, unless done internally.)