Gransnet forums

News & politics

Let it go! Let it go! Turn away and slam the door!

(107 Posts)
GagaJo Wed 15-Apr-20 10:41:36

As a previous Corbynista, I was sad at his stepping down, but hey. That's life. Upwards and onwards.

UNLESS you're a Tory it seems. Many right-wingers, not the left-wingers please note, on here (and IRL) do not appear to be able to say adieu to JC. Constantly harping on about him.

Now, I do think he's a good guy. But he's the past. Life's moved on and we have MUCH more important stuff that we're dealing with now. So why the constant references by NON supporters?

If the roles had been reversed and JC was PM, I wouldn't be giving BJ another thought. I find it all very odd.

Grandad1943 Wed 15-Apr-20 15:42:39

As Starmer demonstrated in his leadership election campaign he is a "flip flopper" who will say anything he feels is inline with the way the wind is blowing.

Whitewavemark2 Wed 15-Apr-20 15:46:11

grandad you are spinning.

Starmer put his name forward after Corbyn resigned.

There is to be an enquiry into the matter.

Imo it will be sensible to wait for that outcome before passing judgement.

We are facing the biggest crises since the war. People are dying in their thousands.

It is utterly self indulgent to concentrate on perceived injustices that will become clear in the fullness of time, whilst neighbours, old folk and NHS staff are dying.

Those being so self indulgent need to get a grip.

suziewoozie Wed 15-Apr-20 16:00:03

Ellan why do you keep posting lies about the Labour Party? FFS. Do you think it’s fine to post without checking your facts? Just stop it

Grandad1943 Wed 15-Apr-20 16:07:48

Whitewavemark2 I am not aware that Starmer has launched an inquiry into the leaked report that has been placed in the hands of the press. If you have a link to such a report being brought forward please place it on here.

However, Starmer and all others on the right of the party have not even spoken on the reports and that is causing huge anger in the broader Labour movement which must be addressed.

One question which came up again and again on my trade union branch WhatsApp group last night was "have the employees who it is alleged carried out this action been suspended from their employment while any investigation takes place." That and others are questions that are requiring answers now not months down the road.

As stated the anger generated at these reports in the wider Labour movement cannot be underestimated as I witnessed on that branch WhatsApp last night. Much of what was stated in those posts could certainly not be reproduced on here without being immediately deleted.

Starmer needs to get a grip on this situation NOW if he is to have a party to lead at all in the near future.

Whitewavemark2 Wed 15-Apr-20 16:12:21

He was talking about it on the radio this morning. R4 8.10 ish.

He is getting a grip. He has launched an enquiry by a completely independent body.

I assume you don’t agree with kangaroo courts?

Grandad1943 Wed 15-Apr-20 16:25:36

Whitewavemark2, well it would certainly seem that Jeremy Corbyn had a continuous Kangaroo court working against him from within the Labour Party Central Office.

Therefore I will ask again, is there a link to any inquiry being launched into this matter, as there is no reference to such on the Labour Party website or it would seem on any trade union or the TUC website?

Whitewavemark2 Wed 15-Apr-20 16:38:42

I refer you to my post above.

I really haven’t the energy to continually revisit or pick the bones of how Corbyn was treated. I fought against it just as you did, but frankly politics never takes prisoners and it is time to move on.

I want a Labour government. I want a democratic socialist government.

It seems to me that if that is not what people want then they must do as you say and leave the Labour Party and set up a socialist party that suits their ideology better.

I am prepared to wait for the outcome of the enquiry, meanwhile my attention is absolutely on the Tories and how they are dealing with the cv crises.

Grandad1943 Wed 15-Apr-20 17:45:47

Whitewavemark2, in regard to your post @16:38 today, many people wish to see a left-leaning government elected in Britain but for that to come about it has to be based on an organisation that is fit for purpose.

In the leaked report it is alleged that central office employees deliberately worked against a Corbyn led Labour victory in the 2017 General Election campaign.

However, the report states much further in how those employees carried that action out. By example, it states that in the middle of that campaign the employees involved where for a month able to sit on information being requested by Corbyn's office by way of sending trivial messages to each other that made them appear they were busy.

That begs the question, where was the line management of these employees or was there collusion in their actions at much higher levels in Central office.

The report also states that since that time the identical employees have carried out the same action in regard to the anti-semitism investigations being carried out by the General Secretaries office (Jenny Formby).

That action has already affected the Equalities Commission investigation into anti-Semitism in the Labour Party in that it has stated in its preliminary report that Formby's office had not progressed with those anti-semitic complaints in the way it should have.

The above is the truth, but now we all know the real reason why. Again the foregoing begs the question of were is the supervision of these employees or has there been again collusion in what these employees have been carrying out at a much higher level.

All the above suggests that the current Parliamentary Labour Party is an organisation that is not fit for purpose. Therefore it is pointless to criticise this conservative government on any matter as with such an underlying organisation the Labour Party will never achieve government at any time in the foreseeable future.

With all the above in mind, many obviously feel this matter must be "sorted out" by Starmer NOW before he engages in seriously trying to unseat this current government however tiresome some fair-weather Labour supporters may find that to be.

Whitewavemark2 Wed 15-Apr-20 17:53:23

grandad as I have indicated I am content to wait for the outcome.

And no I don’t agree that labours internal issues should take precedence over the deaths of so many people, and the need to hold this government to account, or uphold it where is is doing well.

Starmer is hitting absolutely the right tone as far as I am concerned.

Grandad1943 Wed 15-Apr-20 18:02:21

Wishful thinking being carried out by some in this thread I feel. Especially when those persons disappeared from this forum for many weeks following labours defeat in the December general election.

Others of us remained and continued to defend Labour at that time, including the morning following the election results.

Now those fair weather supporters are trying to tell us what's important
In the Labour movement.

Anniebach Wed 15-Apr-20 18:05:09

Labour has had internal issues before. Starmer is ,I hope, giving priority to the thousands suffering now ,

Chewbacca Wed 15-Apr-20 18:05:35

Jeremy Corbyn? Who's he? confused

CraftyGranny Wed 15-Apr-20 18:20:00

Yes Chewbacca who is was he anyway

Ilovecheese Wed 15-Apr-20 18:26:06

I don't think Labour's internal issues are taking precedence over the pandemic, surely it is possible to think about both at the same time.

I am upset about the behaviour that is reported in the document.
I am also furiously stitching scrub hats and wash bags, being upset about what went on at the Labour party does not stop me trying to do my bit to help during the pandemic.

Anniebach Wed 15-Apr-20 18:32:26

Jeremy Corbyn was the leader of the .labour Party who went on holiday during the referendum campaign and refused to
take part in tv debates , regardless of the result leave or remain, he was in the clear

Whitewavemark2 Wed 15-Apr-20 18:45:06

grandad I was nursing my dying mother.

No apology necessary - you of course weren’t to know.

Grandad1943 Wed 15-Apr-20 19:10:07

Whitewavemark2, I apologise if it appeared I included yourself in my post @18:02 today.

There were "a number" who by their posts gave the impression that they were fervent lifelong Labour Party supporters who disappeared from this forum on the night the results were being announced in the December General Election.

That left just myself on this forum the following day still defending the Labour Party and the wider Labour movement.

Therefore Whitewavemark2 perhaps you can understand that when reports such as the one under discussion are released or others re-appear on the forum and engage in telling us who "remained to face all" what now is required in Labour it will touch a nerve.

Chewbacca Wed 15-Apr-20 19:25:25

Ah that Jeremy Corbyn! Thanks anniebach; I'd forgotten all about him.

Chewbacca Wed 15-Apr-20 19:27:19

But why is he being resurrected now? confused I've not seen him mentioned anywhere for weeks; so what's he done to get discussed on here now?

GagaJo Wed 15-Apr-20 19:48:13

WWM, I am completely on the same wavelength of your 16.48 post.

Whitewavemark2 Wed 15-Apr-20 19:48:41

grandad it was pretty clear throughout the run up to the election that the Tories were going to win, but that doesn’t mean that I was not knocked for six by it.
At the same time it had been clear for some time that mum was dying and as she was at home and we were her main carers I decided the morning after the election that I needed to put my disappointment to one side and concentrate on what was important.
GN contrary to how it may seem at times is not terribly important to me. I like the challenge of the debate and it keeps my mind active.

I have supported Labour since before I could vote and I come from a solid labour voting family, from my grandparents and when Labour was first formed to present day.
I have been more or less enthusiastic about each Labour leader as they have come along, but I am above all a democrat and will always give each leader my support until he/she no longer broadly represents me.
My aim is always a labour government because I consider that it is the only political party that is broadly in line with my world view.
But and this is where we will probably part company. I am not a socialist I am firmly in the social democratic camp. I always have been. I believe strongly in a mixed economy and my role models are the Scandinavian countries. Frankly I consider that we have never had a socialist leader, but I know people will disagree with that.
Mum died on 13 th January, and after a while I was ready to take up GN again.
With regard to Corbyn. Yes undoubtedly a man who was poorly served by many in his party. I am of the opinion always that as a Democratic Party it’s members must always give support to its leader but undoubtedly I an naive in this opinion. What is far more important to me is that we get a labour government. We owe it to the poor, the NHS, the economy and for fairness. The fight for a labour government is bigger than any internal disagreement, and so much time and energy appears to me to be wasted. I really can’t be doing with it.

In my view there isn’t a single politician who isn’t indispensable and that includes Corbyn and Starmer.
In time the issue that seems to be so important to so many at the moment will be history, but the poor will still be with us and the fight for a fairer society will still need to be fought.

Grandad1943 Wed 15-Apr-20 19:48:50

Chewbacca try following this thread and the alternative one on the report of the actions of the Labour Party Central Office staff over the past four years.

It's not about Corbyn, it's about the totally disgusting actions of those opposed to him who were employed at that office and who were supposed to be engaged in supporting him.

Whitewavemark2 Wed 15-Apr-20 19:50:11

gaga?

Callistemon Wed 15-Apr-20 19:56:10

Did you not rebel, Whitewave?
That is probably why I voted Liberal because I was rebelling against being brought up by a staunch Labour parent.

Whitewavemark2 Wed 15-Apr-20 20:11:07

callistemon ? no neither have my children. We are a solid labour middle class family. I guess that it was never shoved down our throats but somehow it’s in our genes.

Saying that it doesn’t mean that we disagree profoundly at times with LP policy, but on balance our votes always end up with Labour

I think our mantra above all is fairness, caring and humanity.