Casdon
Subtle change of language between ‘is having to close’ and ‘will have to close’, which means it is not closing until a formal announcement is made then? In reality the reason it is most likely already struggling, which it must be to make a pre-emptive statement, is a fall in pupil numbers which is already happening before Labour come into power. SEN pupils in private schools are often subsidised by LAs, who can no longer afford to pay for high cost placements. I know from talking to Social Services colleagues before I retired that this was already an issue then, and it can only have become more acute as budgets reduce.
You have absolutely no evidence that the school is already struggling. Given what is clear about the type of people who send their children there, and the high proportion of SEN children there, at least some of whom may be LA funded, an increase of 20% in fees is unaffordable - and as I have already said, the school would have to pay full business rates. These are the people Starmer is targeting - not wealthy, just ordinary people trying to do their best for their children and doubtless making sacrifices in order to do so. It’s a disgraceful policy, based on the politics of envy - the idea that anyone whose child attends an independent school is rich. I would dearly love to see Starmer grilled on this.