Iam64
It’s not clear to me what Nandy is saying that differs from the official Labour line as expressed by `Starmer. On 11.03.24 he backed the ban on transgender athletes in female sports. The telegraph article is behind a pay wall. Lisa Nandy appears to say individual sports should decide.
On one level it’s simple to simpletons like me. Any individual who passed through puberty as a male is a male so far as biology strength etc concerned. The should compete in a trans category, not against women or girls
The should compete in a trans category, not against women or girls
But, of course, that will destroy the TWAW argument, because they would have to accept that TWATW - which they don't.
I've just had a thought. If it's accepted that TW who've been through male puberty can compete with women - then logic demands that all biological males should also be allowed to compete with them.
The only difference between a male who's been through male puberty and who subsequently identifies as a woman, and one who doesn't, is just that - inner identity... and what relevance logically does that have when you're partaking in physical sport?
Awkward, isn't it.
so we shouldn't allow unfair competition between trans men and trans women but it's OK for unfair competition between biological women and trans women.
. What you've said makes perfect sense.