I really take offence at Mair's Stepford Wives' jibe. Maybe you should actually watch the film, Mair rather than firing from the hip without substance. As I recall the SWs were tranquilised from the start and totally subservient from the first night they joined the Stepford community. Now, as its a really long time since I decided to live with my partner (53 years to be precise) my recall maybe a bit dodgy, but I'm pretty certain we fell in lust. And children were the last thing on my mind back then in the 'Swinging Sixties. It lasted until last year when he passed away.
I was his partner, in bed , home and business and I never thought twice about leaving our children (3 at the last count)with suitable carers, to accompany him where ever we wanted/ needed to go.And no, I never wore a pinny, stilletos, or a basque! But , we took our children on holidays, enjoyed family events, whilst I was essentially a partner before I was a Mum. So because of that, how dare you label those of us who have had fulfilling lives with our partners, rather than side-lining them for a nest full of children.
Would you like it if I called you an earth mother, conjuring up a picture of a drab, saggy- boobed woman with a baby sling and sandals?
I stand by what I said in an earlier posting ....when some posters have said they couldn't bear to be away from their GCs for more than a day or two, to me it shows the driving reason for marrying was to have children, and ultimately grandchildren. They obviously prefer to be the centre of their children's universe, rather than an adult in a grown-up situation sharing the last years of their lives with someone they (probably) fell in love with,however fleetingly. Each to her own, but don' t you pin a label on me FGS.
Breaking news !..... unfortunately we all die. What are those dependant ACs and GCs
going to do when we pop our clogs? Carry on regardless, I guess.